Thank you for the best, most comprehensive examination of the biggest threat to human life since the flood. We could not have asked for a more knowledgeable expert or more thoroughly prepared interviewer, both of whom deliver every part of their information with clarity and make it understandable to those without a science degree.
I cannot thank you more, David, for making ‘The Truth Contract’ fully available to a person like me who cannot at this time pay a subscription. Unfortunately, despite working all my life until disability took over when I was a University Research Fellow working on Medical conditions, I was deceived by my late husband and now do not have a full pension of any kind which means I could not even pay a taxi fare to the GP Surgery of £6 yesterday. Yet reading and engaging with discussions such as this is my life-line now I am a nearly immobile and house-bound person.
I too spent many hours a day reading every research paper I could obtain as soon as this Covid thing was mooted. I did not believe it. Especially when Ferguson was used to give us number predictions. In fact I said, ‘Now nobody will believe it! Not after his Foot and Mouth catastrophe!’ How wrong was I? What is the matter with people? On that score, I didn’t believe the fantasy of Mattias Desmet of ‘mass formation hypnosis’. I may hold a 1st class Psychology degree but I am a Neuro Psychologist and prefer something less imaginatively based than such theories as that.
My only difference with dear Prof. Angus Dalgleish is my fear that the appearance of this virus probably was deliberate. Fauci said there would be a massive viral outbreak in Trump's time, Gates was far too sure of it and was so ready to make us take this 'amazing vack-seen', plus the virus was set up to 'Largely vaccinate the entire global population' as Gates said. The reason for the 'vack-seek' being to introduce the self-assembling nano particles for the connection of the humans to the internet. and where possible, reduce the population. It was and still is a military operation. It is on-going and needed for among other aspects of the 'New World Oder' the introduction of 15 minute cities and CBDCs. There is so much evidence for all of this and it is coming towards us, with the digital ID, like a massive unassailable army crushing a room full of old ladies. (I'm an old lady so don't take that the wrong way please.)
I shall recommend this film to everybody I possibly can, just as I tell everybody about The Truth Contract. Thank you, a million times!
Thank you. Great interview. One suggestion for an edit to your referendum statement. Since the evidence of harm is overwhelming it would be completely unethical to do any more safety testing, in either humans or animals. Therefore, I would change your referendum statement to refer instead to independent analysis of existing safety data. Important distinction.
I signed The Hope Accord too. The scale of the adverse impact on life, limb and liberty, on deaths, disability and injury, is the worst scenario ever to have been inflicted on man. Biblical would not be an overstatement.
Further note, the reason the studies the doctors are looking at (clinical trials and postmarketing studies) suggest the jabs reduce hospitalisation when the opposite is actually true is because of two methodology flaws as follows: 1) they look at covid events only (e.g. covid hospitalisations) not all-cause hospitalisation. Individual Patient Data analysis of Gloucestershire NHS Trust data by Joel Smalley shows more non-covid hospitalisation in vaccinated (properly defined) vs unvaccinated than potential covid hospitalisations mitigated. 2) Then the apparent benefit on covid outcomes (covid ‘cases’, covid hospitalisations, covid deaths) themselves (with initial high relative effectiveness followed by waning) have been shown by Prof Norman Fenton to be a statistical illusion, created by the definition of ‘vaccinated’ being that your not categorised as ‘vaccinated’ until 7, 14 or 21 days after being injected. In a review of how widespread this flaw was, 38 papers reporting apparent benefit all had some variation of this miscategorisation bias. I’ve seen a paper reporting that these methods were recommended by the CDC, who I understand had 2 patents relating to coronavirus. So, through misdirection of attention (look over here, not over there) and by statistical illusion in the area they did direct people’s attention to, they misled the medical profession and population alike. Now that has to be of use in legal cases(?)
Excellent interview & information. One of the best & most important so far
Thank you Ian!!
Thank you for the best, most comprehensive examination of the biggest threat to human life since the flood. We could not have asked for a more knowledgeable expert or more thoroughly prepared interviewer, both of whom deliver every part of their information with clarity and make it understandable to those without a science degree.
I cannot thank you more, David, for making ‘The Truth Contract’ fully available to a person like me who cannot at this time pay a subscription. Unfortunately, despite working all my life until disability took over when I was a University Research Fellow working on Medical conditions, I was deceived by my late husband and now do not have a full pension of any kind which means I could not even pay a taxi fare to the GP Surgery of £6 yesterday. Yet reading and engaging with discussions such as this is my life-line now I am a nearly immobile and house-bound person.
I too spent many hours a day reading every research paper I could obtain as soon as this Covid thing was mooted. I did not believe it. Especially when Ferguson was used to give us number predictions. In fact I said, ‘Now nobody will believe it! Not after his Foot and Mouth catastrophe!’ How wrong was I? What is the matter with people? On that score, I didn’t believe the fantasy of Mattias Desmet of ‘mass formation hypnosis’. I may hold a 1st class Psychology degree but I am a Neuro Psychologist and prefer something less imaginatively based than such theories as that.
My only difference with dear Prof. Angus Dalgleish is my fear that the appearance of this virus probably was deliberate. Fauci said there would be a massive viral outbreak in Trump's time, Gates was far too sure of it and was so ready to make us take this 'amazing vack-seen', plus the virus was set up to 'Largely vaccinate the entire global population' as Gates said. The reason for the 'vack-seek' being to introduce the self-assembling nano particles for the connection of the humans to the internet. and where possible, reduce the population. It was and still is a military operation. It is on-going and needed for among other aspects of the 'New World Oder' the introduction of 15 minute cities and CBDCs. There is so much evidence for all of this and it is coming towards us, with the digital ID, like a massive unassailable army crushing a room full of old ladies. (I'm an old lady so don't take that the wrong way please.)
I shall recommend this film to everybody I possibly can, just as I tell everybody about The Truth Contract. Thank you, a million times!
what a lovely message - thank you. Keep your excellent comments flowing on other podcasts too.
Thank you. Great interview. One suggestion for an edit to your referendum statement. Since the evidence of harm is overwhelming it would be completely unethical to do any more safety testing, in either humans or animals. Therefore, I would change your referendum statement to refer instead to independent analysis of existing safety data. Important distinction.
I signed The Hope Accord too. The scale of the adverse impact on life, limb and liberty, on deaths, disability and injury, is the worst scenario ever to have been inflicted on man. Biblical would not be an overstatement.
Further note, the reason the studies the doctors are looking at (clinical trials and postmarketing studies) suggest the jabs reduce hospitalisation when the opposite is actually true is because of two methodology flaws as follows: 1) they look at covid events only (e.g. covid hospitalisations) not all-cause hospitalisation. Individual Patient Data analysis of Gloucestershire NHS Trust data by Joel Smalley shows more non-covid hospitalisation in vaccinated (properly defined) vs unvaccinated than potential covid hospitalisations mitigated. 2) Then the apparent benefit on covid outcomes (covid ‘cases’, covid hospitalisations, covid deaths) themselves (with initial high relative effectiveness followed by waning) have been shown by Prof Norman Fenton to be a statistical illusion, created by the definition of ‘vaccinated’ being that your not categorised as ‘vaccinated’ until 7, 14 or 21 days after being injected. In a review of how widespread this flaw was, 38 papers reporting apparent benefit all had some variation of this miscategorisation bias. I’ve seen a paper reporting that these methods were recommended by the CDC, who I understand had 2 patents relating to coronavirus. So, through misdirection of attention (look over here, not over there) and by statistical illusion in the area they did direct people’s attention to, they misled the medical profession and population alike. Now that has to be of use in legal cases(?)
many thanks for this useful edit suggestion to the referendum policy read out in the interview. we will embrace your sugestions.