This is an ever evolving list of amazing new guests we have in our pipeline! So be sure to pop back here often as we'll update it regularly! If you have any requests of high calibre speakers who are on point and on topic for The Truth Contract, please also let us know!
To understand the world we need to understand their plan. Not sure if anyone has compiled the big picture which would educated & prevent much confusion & anger
Apologies my post is rather long,
Discussion Document: Decoding Global Agendas and Their Impact on Society
Introduction This document aims to provide a structured analysis of interconnected global agendas, their objectives, and their collective impact on society.
By examining these plans holistically, we can better contextualize seemingly disparate current events, which often appear chaotic or disconnected when viewed in isolation.
The orchestrated nature of certain events and media narratives may contribute to public confusion, emotional fatigue, and societal polarization.
This document seeks to clarify these dynamics, offering a framework for discussion and critical inquiry for everyone.
The agendas discussed below, attributed to various global entities and initiatives, appear to converge toward centralized control, reduced individual autonomy, and a reshaping of societal structures.
While some elements remain speculative, this document synthesizes key claims to facilitate informed dialogue. It is not intended to endorse or dismiss these ideas but to provide a foundation for analysis and debate.
Core Thesis A series of interconnected plans, often associated with global institutions like the United Nations (UN) and the World Economic Forum (WEF), are believed to aim for:
• Centralized power: Consolidation of authority under global institutions.
• Population control: Measures to reduce or manage global population size.
• Orwellian governance: Creation of controlled, technology-driven urban environments with diminished personal freedoms.
• Erosion of identity: Dissolution of national, cultural, religious, and gender identities.
• Digital surveillance: Implementation of digital currencies and IDs for comprehensive monitoring.
• Restricted freedoms: Limited access to travel, rural areas, and natural resources for the general population.
• AI-driven systems: Automation of manufacturing, education, healthcare, and legal systems, reducing human agency.
Below, we outline the key plans and strategies often cited in discussions of these agendas, followed by their purported mechanisms and societal implications.
Key Agendas and Strategies
1 Kalergi Plan (1925)
◦ Claim: Advocates for mass migration to erode national borders, sovereignty, and distinct cultural identities, fostering a homogenized global population.
◦ Objective: Dissolve national identities to facilitate global governance.
◦ Implications: Migration policies may prioritize integration challenges, potentially straining social cohesion and national economies.
2 Cloward-Piven Strategy (1966)
◦ Claim: Overwhelm welfare systems with unsustainable demands to destabilize economies, leading to societal collapse and paving the way for centralized control.
◦ Objective: Create economic crises to justify systemic restructuring.
◦ Implications: Unsustainable social programs could exacerbate fiscal crises, increasing reliance on centralized interventions.
3 LGBT and Social Movements (1960s–Present)
◦ Claim: Social movements, including those tied to gender and identity, are leveraged to challenge traditional norms, weakening cultural and familial structures.
◦ Objective: Redefine societal norms to align with globalized, uniform ideologies.
◦ Implications: Shifts in cultural values may polarize societies, creating divisions that distract from broader systemic changes.
4 UN Conference on Human Settlements (1976) – Land Agenda
◦ Claim: Promotes public ownership and control of land, restricting private property rights.
◦ Objective: Centralize control over land use and resources.
◦ Implications: Reduced individual access to land may limit personal autonomy and rural lifestyles.
5 Club of Rome (1972) and Climate Emergency Plan (2018)
◦ Claim: Uses environmental crises as a pretext for authoritarian policies, restricting freedoms under the guise of conservation.
◦ Objective: Leverage fear of climate collapse to enforce compliance with global policies.
◦ Implications: Policies like Net Zero may prioritize environmental goals over economic stability, impacting industries and livelihoods.
6 The Manhattan Principles (2004–2019) – One Health
◦ Claim: Integrates human, animal, and environmental health under a single framework, promoting global citizenship, conservation, and centralized health policies.
◦ Objective: Unify global health governance, potentially equating human and animal rights while prioritizing biodiversity over human activity.
◦ Implications: Policies may restrict land use and human activity in the name of environmental protection, limiting individual freedoms.
7 UN Agenda 21/2030
◦ Claim: Focuses on sustainable development, controlling land ownership, and means of production, particularly food systems.
◦ Objective: Centralize resource management under the banner of sustainability.
◦ Implications: Food security and agricultural autonomy may be compromised, increasing dependence on global systems.
8 WEF Great Reset (2020–Present)
◦ Claim: Exploits crises (e.g., pandemics, economic instability) to justify sweeping reforms toward global governance.
◦ Objective: Reshape economies and societies under centralized control, emphasizing digital transformation and sustainability.
◦ Implications: Crises may be used to accelerate policies that reduce personal freedoms and increase surveillance.
Mechanisms of Implementation These agendas are said to be advanced through various mechanisms, including:
• Mass Immigration: To challenge national identities and strain resources.
• Climate Change Narratives: To justify restrictive environmental policies.
• Net Zero Initiatives: To transform energy and economic systems, often at the cost of individual livelihoods.
• Wokism and Cultural Shifts: To redefine societal norms and weaken traditional structures.
• Plandemics and Health Policies: To enforce compliance through health-related mandates.
• Digital Currency and IDs: To enable comprehensive surveillance and control of financial transactions.
• Censorship and Lawfare: To suppress dissent and control narratives.
• Economic Instability: To create dependency on global institutions through debt crises.
• Erosion of Sovereignty: To replace national governance with global frameworks.
• Military and Psychological Operations: To manipulate public perception and maintain control.
Societal Implications The convergence of these agendas could lead to:
• Loss of Individual Freedoms: Travel restrictions, limited access to rural areas, and synthetic diets controlled by centralized systems.
• Surveillance State: Digital IDs and currencies enabling 24/7 monitoring.
• Cultural Homogenization: Erosion of national, religious, and gender identities in favor of a globalized “citizen” archetype.
• AI-Driven Governance: Automation of critical systems, reducing human agency and accountability.
• Economic Dependency: Increased reliance on global institutions due to manufactured crises.
• Polarization and Confusion: Media-driven narratives fostering division and emotional exhaustion.
Discussion Points
1 Evidence and Credibility: What verifiable evidence supports or refutes these claims? Are there alternative explanations for these events and policies?
2 Intent vs. Outcome: Are these agendas deliberate, or are they the unintended consequences of complex global systems?
3 Public Response: How can individuals and communities critically engage with these trends while preserving autonomy and cultural identity?
4 Balancing Progress and Freedom: Can sustainability and technological advancement coexist with individual liberties?
5 Global vs. Local Governance: What are the risks and benefits of centralized versus decentralized systems?
Conclusion This document provides a framework for understanding the interconnected agendas that may shape global events and societal structures.
While some claims remain speculative, the patterns identified warrant critical examination.
By fostering open dialogue, we can better navigate the complexities of these agendas and their implications for the future.
Stakeholders are encouraged to approach these topics with skepticism, seeking primary sources and diverse perspectives to inform their understanding.
Call to Action
• Engage in informed discussions with peers and communities.
• Research primary sources, such as UN and WEF publications, to verify claims.
• Advocate for transparency and accountability in global and local governance.
• Reflect on the balance between collective goals and individual freedoms.
Note: This document is intended for discussion purposes and does not endorse or dismiss the claims presented. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently
Discussion Document: Decoding Global Agendas and Their Impact on Society
Thank you for inviting me to discuss my analysis on elite agendas on your podcast. I’m truly honored by the opportunity to share my perspective but I think there are far better people than me. At this time, I’m unable to accept the invitation due to personal commitments. My research is primarily for my own understanding of global agendas & events which I share from time to time. I keep asking why until I can answer my question
I fully support the mission of the Truth Contract & will look foreword to helping where I can in the future
May I suggest Doc Malik, an awakened ex surgeon who I follow. He has a substat account
I have approached Doc Malik and hope to book him on a podcast in the next 6-8 weeks. Otherwise, it would be good to book in a zoom chat with you some time. Drop an email to info@thetruthcontract.co.uk and i will send you a zoom diary invite widget for you to book in an exploratory call. Have a great weekend.
Ian. Would you like to do a podcast with me? David
This is an ever evolving list of amazing new guests we have in our pipeline! So be sure to pop back here often as we'll update it regularly! If you have any requests of high calibre speakers who are on point and on topic for The Truth Contract, please also let us know!
To understand the world we need to understand their plan. Not sure if anyone has compiled the big picture which would educated & prevent much confusion & anger
Apologies my post is rather long,
Discussion Document: Decoding Global Agendas and Their Impact on Society
Introduction This document aims to provide a structured analysis of interconnected global agendas, their objectives, and their collective impact on society.
By examining these plans holistically, we can better contextualize seemingly disparate current events, which often appear chaotic or disconnected when viewed in isolation.
The orchestrated nature of certain events and media narratives may contribute to public confusion, emotional fatigue, and societal polarization.
This document seeks to clarify these dynamics, offering a framework for discussion and critical inquiry for everyone.
The agendas discussed below, attributed to various global entities and initiatives, appear to converge toward centralized control, reduced individual autonomy, and a reshaping of societal structures.
While some elements remain speculative, this document synthesizes key claims to facilitate informed dialogue. It is not intended to endorse or dismiss these ideas but to provide a foundation for analysis and debate.
Core Thesis A series of interconnected plans, often associated with global institutions like the United Nations (UN) and the World Economic Forum (WEF), are believed to aim for:
• Centralized power: Consolidation of authority under global institutions.
• Population control: Measures to reduce or manage global population size.
• Orwellian governance: Creation of controlled, technology-driven urban environments with diminished personal freedoms.
• Erosion of identity: Dissolution of national, cultural, religious, and gender identities.
• Digital surveillance: Implementation of digital currencies and IDs for comprehensive monitoring.
• Restricted freedoms: Limited access to travel, rural areas, and natural resources for the general population.
• AI-driven systems: Automation of manufacturing, education, healthcare, and legal systems, reducing human agency.
Below, we outline the key plans and strategies often cited in discussions of these agendas, followed by their purported mechanisms and societal implications.
Key Agendas and Strategies
1 Kalergi Plan (1925)
◦ Claim: Advocates for mass migration to erode national borders, sovereignty, and distinct cultural identities, fostering a homogenized global population.
◦ Objective: Dissolve national identities to facilitate global governance.
◦ Implications: Migration policies may prioritize integration challenges, potentially straining social cohesion and national economies.
2 Cloward-Piven Strategy (1966)
◦ Claim: Overwhelm welfare systems with unsustainable demands to destabilize economies, leading to societal collapse and paving the way for centralized control.
◦ Objective: Create economic crises to justify systemic restructuring.
◦ Implications: Unsustainable social programs could exacerbate fiscal crises, increasing reliance on centralized interventions.
3 LGBT and Social Movements (1960s–Present)
◦ Claim: Social movements, including those tied to gender and identity, are leveraged to challenge traditional norms, weakening cultural and familial structures.
◦ Objective: Redefine societal norms to align with globalized, uniform ideologies.
◦ Implications: Shifts in cultural values may polarize societies, creating divisions that distract from broader systemic changes.
4 UN Conference on Human Settlements (1976) – Land Agenda
◦ Claim: Promotes public ownership and control of land, restricting private property rights.
◦ Objective: Centralize control over land use and resources.
◦ Implications: Reduced individual access to land may limit personal autonomy and rural lifestyles.
5 Club of Rome (1972) and Climate Emergency Plan (2018)
◦ Claim: Uses environmental crises as a pretext for authoritarian policies, restricting freedoms under the guise of conservation.
◦ Objective: Leverage fear of climate collapse to enforce compliance with global policies.
◦ Implications: Policies like Net Zero may prioritize environmental goals over economic stability, impacting industries and livelihoods.
6 The Manhattan Principles (2004–2019) – One Health
◦ Claim: Integrates human, animal, and environmental health under a single framework, promoting global citizenship, conservation, and centralized health policies.
◦ Objective: Unify global health governance, potentially equating human and animal rights while prioritizing biodiversity over human activity.
◦ Implications: Policies may restrict land use and human activity in the name of environmental protection, limiting individual freedoms.
7 UN Agenda 21/2030
◦ Claim: Focuses on sustainable development, controlling land ownership, and means of production, particularly food systems.
◦ Objective: Centralize resource management under the banner of sustainability.
◦ Implications: Food security and agricultural autonomy may be compromised, increasing dependence on global systems.
8 WEF Great Reset (2020–Present)
◦ Claim: Exploits crises (e.g., pandemics, economic instability) to justify sweeping reforms toward global governance.
◦ Objective: Reshape economies and societies under centralized control, emphasizing digital transformation and sustainability.
◦ Implications: Crises may be used to accelerate policies that reduce personal freedoms and increase surveillance.
Mechanisms of Implementation These agendas are said to be advanced through various mechanisms, including:
• Mass Immigration: To challenge national identities and strain resources.
• Climate Change Narratives: To justify restrictive environmental policies.
• Net Zero Initiatives: To transform energy and economic systems, often at the cost of individual livelihoods.
• Wokism and Cultural Shifts: To redefine societal norms and weaken traditional structures.
• Plandemics and Health Policies: To enforce compliance through health-related mandates.
• Digital Currency and IDs: To enable comprehensive surveillance and control of financial transactions.
• Censorship and Lawfare: To suppress dissent and control narratives.
• Economic Instability: To create dependency on global institutions through debt crises.
• Erosion of Sovereignty: To replace national governance with global frameworks.
• Military and Psychological Operations: To manipulate public perception and maintain control.
Societal Implications The convergence of these agendas could lead to:
• Loss of Individual Freedoms: Travel restrictions, limited access to rural areas, and synthetic diets controlled by centralized systems.
• Surveillance State: Digital IDs and currencies enabling 24/7 monitoring.
• Cultural Homogenization: Erosion of national, religious, and gender identities in favor of a globalized “citizen” archetype.
• AI-Driven Governance: Automation of critical systems, reducing human agency and accountability.
• Economic Dependency: Increased reliance on global institutions due to manufactured crises.
• Polarization and Confusion: Media-driven narratives fostering division and emotional exhaustion.
Discussion Points
1 Evidence and Credibility: What verifiable evidence supports or refutes these claims? Are there alternative explanations for these events and policies?
2 Intent vs. Outcome: Are these agendas deliberate, or are they the unintended consequences of complex global systems?
3 Public Response: How can individuals and communities critically engage with these trends while preserving autonomy and cultural identity?
4 Balancing Progress and Freedom: Can sustainability and technological advancement coexist with individual liberties?
5 Global vs. Local Governance: What are the risks and benefits of centralized versus decentralized systems?
Conclusion This document provides a framework for understanding the interconnected agendas that may shape global events and societal structures.
While some claims remain speculative, the patterns identified warrant critical examination.
By fostering open dialogue, we can better navigate the complexities of these agendas and their implications for the future.
Stakeholders are encouraged to approach these topics with skepticism, seeking primary sources and diverse perspectives to inform their understanding.
Call to Action
• Engage in informed discussions with peers and communities.
• Research primary sources, such as UN and WEF publications, to verify claims.
• Advocate for transparency and accountability in global and local governance.
• Reflect on the balance between collective goals and individual freedoms.
Note: This document is intended for discussion purposes and does not endorse or dismiss the claims presented. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently
Discussion Document: Decoding Global Agendas and Their Impact on Society
Ian, did you get my message about you doing a podcast with me about all of this? David
Hi David
Thank you for inviting me to discuss my analysis on elite agendas on your podcast. I’m truly honored by the opportunity to share my perspective but I think there are far better people than me. At this time, I’m unable to accept the invitation due to personal commitments. My research is primarily for my own understanding of global agendas & events which I share from time to time. I keep asking why until I can answer my question
I fully support the mission of the Truth Contract & will look foreword to helping where I can in the future
May I suggest Doc Malik, an awakened ex surgeon who I follow. He has a substat account
Kind Regards
Ian
I have approached Doc Malik and hope to book him on a podcast in the next 6-8 weeks. Otherwise, it would be good to book in a zoom chat with you some time. Drop an email to info@thetruthcontract.co.uk and i will send you a zoom diary invite widget for you to book in an exploratory call. Have a great weekend.